The victim was made to feel as bad as the perpetrators, and that can't be right"
Overview
In December 2009, I reported to the Portsmouth Police my suspicions that a recorded delivery letter sent by me had been stolen.
As of two years later, this case has not been properly dealt with.
My report to the police was serious and sincere and was based on the the grounds that
- the letter had patently got into the hands of someone it was not intended for.
- the intended recipient denied ever receiving it
The Police responded by ignoring me.
The links at the left give a chronological list of events.
Harassment and assault by a certain person - and my initial efforts to try and take legal action to stop this harassment
My Arrest by the Police for attempting to take legal action against my harasser/assaulter. (by rights the police should give me a medal for putting up with that harassment without retaliation, rather than prosecuting me for it)
My Complaint to the Police w.r.t. my suspicions that a recorded delivery letters presented in the 'evidence' for my arrest had in fact been stolen
IPCC process - the IPCC being the so-called Independent Police Complaints Commission
Parallel Complaint : while, as I state above, I was of the impression that the police initially responded by ignoring me, the Police have come up with an alternative version - they did respond, telling me why my suspicions were ungrounded. This has set me off on a parallel course of action to try and get a copy of the letter they sent me on this occasion - a course of action which has proved fruitless so far
IPCC re-visited
Current Situation
I have attempted to make my statements as falsifiable as possible, in line with the scientific method. By falsifiable, I mean that if what I am saying is wrong then it should be easy enough to show clearly (i.e. prove) that I am wrong.
This is the 'letter of closure' issued by the police, which obviously does not mention the recorded delivery letter (click on thumbnail). It contradicts the previous statement made the police to the IPCC, a statement which also made no relevant mention of the recorded delivery letter.
